Sunday, 23 March 2014

Why Does the Media Play Down the Role of Claims Handling Companies?


Last year, many people turned to claims handlers to help them get their mis sold PPI refunds, and indeed, they did get the refunds they deserve, and owing 25% to the claims handler upon success. The Financial Ombudsman, the consumer group Which and the Financial Conduct Authority all downplayed the role of claims handlers because of the obvious signs that “ambulance-chasing” is becoming a lucrative business.




A consumer or victim who wants to claim compensation at the shortest time possible could use claims handlers as one way, but even CMCs, or Claims Management Companies, even tell consumers or victims that they can always make a claim on their own. The media fails to iterate that CMCs can save time, which the consumers pay for in making a hassle-free compensation claim.

Most victims of UK road or car accident seek help from claims handlers because they do not know the right documents, evidences or information needed by insurance companies to process their benefits. Only rogue CMCs perform cold calls or text messages. Most CMCs only have minimal advertising, or only have satisfied clients, such as myself, endorse their services. The media only focuses on money-making and scamming groups organisations. I have been a victim of one myself.

Just remember that claims handlers are one way to get your compensation, but if you do enough research, you could get back your full refund or compensation without having to pay (or looking for other ways to pay) 25%  to your claims handler.