Tuesday, 15 March 2016

Legal & General Sunk Itself?

When you hide something, it's bound to come out. Some people will snoop around and expose it, with both positive and negative implications.



Legal & General might have sunk itself as analysts found that its capital buffers are lower than its target solvency capital ratio of 169 per cent. While it satisfies the insurer requirement of 100 per cent, it places itself on a weaker spot as it did not hit JPMorgan's expectations of 180 per cent.

It said "In our view, Legal & General has a higher risk balance sheet compared to Standard Life and Aviva and thus a ratio lower that is less impressive to us."

But then again, even when you're profiting, if your downline isn't solid, the roots can give out at any time and it can mean trouble.

According to Legal & General Chief Executive NIgel Wilson:

"We have a robust business model which has proved to be adept and resilient in dealing with fiscal and regulatory changes in our sector.

"We are planning for more global economic and market volatility and are well positioned for continued pressure on pricing and changes."


Other analysts, such as Hargreaves Lansdown's Steve Clayton pointed out that Legal and General had rebased its dividends upwards, indicating only progress in the near future.